I attended an event where one of the speakers remarked, “I live in a town of 4000, of which 8000 are artists.” The laughter soon faded as the meaning began to sink in: “There are too many who think they are artists.” And here we were, aspiring artists, listening to that message from a Master.
Perhaps that’s not a bad idea to consider by those who venture on the artistic path. By acknowledging that creativity abounds, that each of us brings desire to the table, there are important questions that begged to be asked.
Does innate talent play a larger role in one's success as an artist than practice, passion, determination and resiliency? I have wondered about this question throughout the more than a decade and a half that I have been writing about art, and I haven’t yet come up with a solid answer. But what I have done is look to those who have been recognized as “artists” to try to identify what might be unique about them. And patterns begin to emerge.
They see clearly the end result they want to achieve, and they follow their own direction to get there. Whether this relates to style, to starting or finishing, to subject matter, what they value most is clarifying their own vision of what it “will look like” when it is finished.
They have a master's understanding of the tools they use, the historical foundations behind their approach, the mechanics in producing a finished appearance that is both uniquely theirs and uniquely beautiful.
They bring elements that are both personal and universal into the visual message. They know what they are in an intangible way, and it is the underlying support of their painting.
They approach the canvas, paper, clay with a confidence and ease that reveals the level of understanding they have achieved.
Is this talent? Or a combination of various factors? I found this interview with Daniel Sprick extremely interesting: in it, he said, "One of the things I like to do as an artist is to challenge my own preconceptions." Between believing in the 10,000 hours concept and grinding out a painting a day - both ideas which may or may not have merit - when do we ever talk about what constitutes substance, authenticity, poetic sensitivity or contemporary relevance except in the vaguest terms? However you want to articulate it, there is something that some people do that the majority of us have not considered doing. We can label it as talent, or knowledge and experience, but they are able to produce paintings year after year that impress us. Call it gravitas, call it courage to produce work that speaks with your own voice, call it an ability to bring life into a flat surface and colored oil - these are conversations more artists should have, something we ought to start amongst ourselves as we search for our own answers.
An artist needs the craft. She needs an thorough awareness of art history to better understand the influences that appeal to her. Seeking out and sharing the sources of information and inspiration, such as the "Liminal Spaces: A Conversation with Daniel Sprick" post by Elana Hagler, and posted on the Painting Perceptions: commentary on perceptual painting blog, can help contribute to the important connections we artists need to make to further our personal understanding of the work we have chosen to do.
Please share your favorite resources in the comments section below.
And Thank You for reading today.