One focus of this blog is to share information about artists as they age.
In part this is to refute the idea that older artists lose value as they age, but also to argue against the belief that adults who pursue art in their "retirement years" do so for inconsequential reasons.
To dismiss the artistic investigation by an adult over fifty, and certainly over sixty or seventy, as “pastime activity” does a disservice to those who put the idea of an “art career” on hold for decades due to circumstance, obligation, location, or immaturity.
And I reject that argument.
I recently discovered the Research Center for Arts and Culture, supported by the Pollock-Krasner Foundation and the Cornell Institute for Translational Research on Aging, and their 2006 Research Report titled ABOVE GROUND: Information on Artists III: Special Focus New York City Aging Artists. Dr. Robert N. Butler, President and CEO of the International Longevity Center, explains that “Not only does this study combat the misperceptions of aging, it sheds new light by the unique solutions artists embrace in living… It shows them as productive, self-aware and savvy. And it provides some new ways of thinking about all of us as we age.”
This study reveals some interesting facts: for instance, the experience of being a professional artist (as in a life-long commitment to art) seems to be universal. We do not need to be living in a major art market to share this aspect of being an artist. But I would add that the requirements of researching specific populations create an unintended bias, in this case one against the Late Bloomers, those who meet the definition of being a serious artist – life-long pursuit, educational accomplishments, exhibition records, sales, and members of artistic communities – but when asked the questions “When did you start and where do you live?” we can only answer “a decade ago and we live everywhere."
It is important to note that the artists in this study were all visual artists living in specific areas of New York City, between the ages of 65 and 91, who self-identified as professional artists, answering questions such as I consider myself an artist, the main body of my activity is some form of art, and I have a demonstrated record of exhibition, performances, installations, publications or other evidence of my art.
Here are some of the more interesting facts that caught my attention:
- Artists are very invested in their careers, which are not seen as traditional experiences but circumstances that provide a high level of life satisfaction.
- More female artists than male experienced interruptions in their careers. Women also reported more gender bias (not surprisingly men reported none), while all artists reported experiencing discrimination based on age and choice of medium.
- The core experience of being an artist is universal, with less satisfaction regarding critical review, career opportunities, and income, and high levels of satisfaction from personal autonomy and validation as an artist.
- Artists never retire; they work in their studios daily.
- Artists rank higher in Life Satisfaction Scales than the rest of the population, even as they age.
- Social networks – and daily communication within those artist-to-artist networks – are important to productivity.
- A majority of artists continue to sell their work, but income from art remains a small percentage of overall income.
I often receive emails from readers wanting Career Advice. And this is what I have learned: even though this blog has a subtitle of "developing an art career after fifty," your Art Career is not likely to meet the definition of a career in our youth-oriented, income-measured, and single-goal-oriented culture. At times the artist’s life can be difficult to sustain economically. It is not easily justified to others who expect traditional cause-and-effect results. And it is more likely to be a broad, multi-dimensional, life-long experience that is highly satisfying to self-aware, productive, and flexible individuals who cannot imagine living without producing their art.
Most of us consider this a fair trade-off.
“How are you doing today?”
97-year old visual artist: “Well, I’m above ground.”—IOA III Aging Study
“Art is the only thing that’s left in the world.”
—Homeless mixed media artist, age 72, one of the many quotes from Above Ground
IMPORTANT LINKS: http://www.artsandcultureresearch.org/
after thoughts: When my mother passed away a few years ago I received a folder containing all of my report cards, from kindergarten to the end of high shcool. I was an average student, but consistently, I received an A in art from every teacher, every year. My parents were unimpressed. I took my cues from them, and wandered in the wilderness until I grew up at age fifty.
Starting early does not tell you whether a person has the talent to be a successful artist: it only tells you that they grew up in a supportive, enriching, artistic environment where they were mentored early and encouraged to achieve their goals.
It can also take you a decade to reach the level of professional accomplishment that puts you in the game, and another decade to begin to see significant results.
That leaves you a few more decades to play with, give or take your starting point.

Adriel - welcome to the adventure!
Posted by: sue | February 11, 2013 at 08:25 AM
OMG, this is what I needed! I will be 50 in two months and what have I started doing that I've always wanted to do until now? Paint, draw, print...encaustic, I want to do all of it, feel like I have so much to catch up. I loved this article, thank you soon much!
Posted by: Adriel | February 08, 2013 at 09:07 PM
Hi David,
You are right, we have all found ways to create art without really calling it that,putting things off until "later." And then one day we realize that there is no perfect time or circumstance. To steal the slogan from Nike - "Just Do It."
Posted by: sue smith | January 29, 2013 at 07:01 AM
Hi Sue,
I turned 65 on 9 January this year. I've been painting and drawing since childhood but only took up painting seriously in 2003. My wife always says "you can do that when you retire" (from the day job)but my response is always that I can't wait. I hope to be able to devote all my time to painting later this year when I am able to retire from my job in IT and take a great deal of encouragement from your site. Making art doesn't stop; you just keep on doing it. It comes from inside!
Regards,
David
Posted by: David Raison | January 29, 2013 at 02:33 AM
Thanks for the article, it put a smile on my face.
63 and still blooming!
(from an email response)
Posted by: sue smith | January 22, 2013 at 08:40 AM
Dear Sue,
LOVE this post and your thoughts on that study. I am 74 and have done art off and on all my life with a very supportive family, parents who did art themselves and so understood its importance to me and my sister (she is a jewelry designer and craftsperson). But what it has done for my life (with interruptions to be sure!) is beyond description. It is beyond essential for me to do it, to teach it, to LOOK every day at what enchants or interests me.
I teach many who have finally retired and can do it at last. Sometimes the stories break my heart because of what they had to suppress due to no support, or worse. I'm doing my part to see that the flower blooms, even now. One is still here, one should LIVE!
Lynne Oakes
www.joyofartstudio.com
Posted by: sue smith | January 22, 2013 at 08:39 AM
Thank you, Maria! I admire the color in your work and the way you communicate the energy in subject matter!
Posted by: sue smith | January 21, 2013 at 05:05 PM
I always appreciate your viewpoint. and it has more cred since your work is beautiful and amazing. I think of you as a landscape artist but your still life work rocks. Keep it coming!
Posted by: Maria Poroy | January 21, 2013 at 03:43 PM